Blog

Blog

Blog

Written by

Alexander Gekov

Co-Founder & CTO

Request Demo

LinkedIn Can Make You More Successful
LinkedIn Can Make You More Successful
LinkedIn Can Make You More Successful
LinkedIn Can Make You More Successful

If you’ve ever wondered whether time on LinkedIn actually pays off in your career, the evidence says yes—but with a crucial caveat. It’s not the mere existence of a profile or the occasional scroll that makes a difference. What matters most is how you structure your network and the kind of professional content you share.

The study at a glance

A representative survey of Dutch online workers compared LinkedIn, Twitter, and Facebook for “professional informational benefits” - that is, timely access to relevant work information and referrals to career opportunities. The headline findings:

  • LinkedIn users reported higher professional informational benefits than non‑users. Twitter users also reported higher benefits, though smaller than LinkedIn’s.

  • Facebook use was associated with lower professional informational benefits.

  • Within each platform, two behaviors consistently predicted better outcomes: posting professional content and strategic networking (deliberately adding relevant contacts).

  • On LinkedIn, both strong ties (close colleagues) and weak ties (acquaintances, former coworkers) boosted informational benefits. On Facebook, only strong ties mattered. On Twitter, the raw number of ties didn’t matter; strategic networking did.

  • Passive reading helped a bit on LinkedIn but played a minor role compared to content and network quality.

Why LinkedIn outperforms

LinkedIn’s architecture is intentionally work‑centric. Profiles mirror a CV. Newsfeeds, groups, and search are tuned to professional topics. People are more likely to follow colleagues in their field, industry leaders, and potential collaborators than on generalist platforms. That means:

  • Higher signal-to-noise: You’re more likely to see relevant trends, opportunities, and expertise.

  • More weak ties: These are the people who know things you don’t and can open doors outside your immediate circle - classic “strength of weak ties.”

  • Easier reputation building: Sharing substantive work content and participating in groups showcases your expertise to the right audience.

Why LinkedIn outperforms

LinkedIn’s architecture is intentionally work‑centric. Profiles mirror a CV. Newsfeeds, groups, and search are tuned to professional topics. People are more likely to follow colleagues in their field, industry leaders, and potential collaborators than on generalist platforms. That means:

  • Higher signal-to-noise: You’re more likely to see relevant trends, opportunities, and expertise.

  • More weak ties: These are the people who know things you don’t and can open doors outside your immediate circle - classic “strength of weak ties.”

  • Easier reputation building: Sharing substantive work content and participating in groups showcases your expertise to the right audience.

Why LinkedIn outperforms

LinkedIn’s architecture is intentionally work‑centric. Profiles mirror a CV. Newsfeeds, groups, and search are tuned to professional topics. People are more likely to follow colleagues in their field, industry leaders, and potential collaborators than on generalist platforms. That means:

  • Higher signal-to-noise: You’re more likely to see relevant trends, opportunities, and expertise.

  • More weak ties: These are the people who know things you don’t and can open doors outside your immediate circle - classic “strength of weak ties.”

  • Easier reputation building: Sharing substantive work content and participating in groups showcases your expertise to the right audience.

What actually drives benefits

The research points to three practical levers that anyone can pull.

Post professional content

Think of this as a proof‑of‑work feed. Share:

  • Project learnings and case studies (what you did, why it mattered, how you’d improve it next time).

  • Industry analyses (summaries of reports, conference takeaways, trend breakdowns).

  • Advice exchanges (questions about tools, methods, stakeholder challenges).

Pro tip: Groups matter. Posting in relevant LinkedIn groups yielded stronger benefits than general status updates, likely because group audiences are more targeted and discussions more substantive.

Practice strategic networking

This is not “add everyone.” It’s deliberate:

  • Map your opportunity lattice: list target roles, firms, skills, and domains you want to access.

  • Add people who sit at the intersections—experts, hiring managers, partners, alumni, speakers, and contributors in your niche.

  • When connecting, personalize: mention a shared context or specific insight from their work, and state the exchange value you can offer.

Pro tip: Balance your portfolio. Cultivate both strong ties (trusted collaborators for complex knowledge) and weak ties (fresh perspectives, new opportunities). On LinkedIn, both move the needle.

Read with intent (but don’t rely on it)

Passive reading can build ambient awareness—who knows what, who is working on what—which lowers the friction to ask for help. However, reading alone has small effects. Treat it as reconnaissance that informs outreach and content.

What actually drives benefits

The research points to three practical levers that anyone can pull.

Post professional content

Think of this as a proof‑of‑work feed. Share:

  • Project learnings and case studies (what you did, why it mattered, how you’d improve it next time).

  • Industry analyses (summaries of reports, conference takeaways, trend breakdowns).

  • Advice exchanges (questions about tools, methods, stakeholder challenges).

Pro tip: Groups matter. Posting in relevant LinkedIn groups yielded stronger benefits than general status updates, likely because group audiences are more targeted and discussions more substantive.

Practice strategic networking

This is not “add everyone.” It’s deliberate:

  • Map your opportunity lattice: list target roles, firms, skills, and domains you want to access.

  • Add people who sit at the intersections—experts, hiring managers, partners, alumni, speakers, and contributors in your niche.

  • When connecting, personalize: mention a shared context or specific insight from their work, and state the exchange value you can offer.

Pro tip: Balance your portfolio. Cultivate both strong ties (trusted collaborators for complex knowledge) and weak ties (fresh perspectives, new opportunities). On LinkedIn, both move the needle.

Read with intent (but don’t rely on it)

Passive reading can build ambient awareness—who knows what, who is working on what—which lowers the friction to ask for help. However, reading alone has small effects. Treat it as reconnaissance that informs outreach and content.

What actually drives benefits

The research points to three practical levers that anyone can pull.

Post professional content

Think of this as a proof‑of‑work feed. Share:

  • Project learnings and case studies (what you did, why it mattered, how you’d improve it next time).

  • Industry analyses (summaries of reports, conference takeaways, trend breakdowns).

  • Advice exchanges (questions about tools, methods, stakeholder challenges).

Pro tip: Groups matter. Posting in relevant LinkedIn groups yielded stronger benefits than general status updates, likely because group audiences are more targeted and discussions more substantive.

Practice strategic networking

This is not “add everyone.” It’s deliberate:

  • Map your opportunity lattice: list target roles, firms, skills, and domains you want to access.

  • Add people who sit at the intersections—experts, hiring managers, partners, alumni, speakers, and contributors in your niche.

  • When connecting, personalize: mention a shared context or specific insight from their work, and state the exchange value you can offer.

Pro tip: Balance your portfolio. Cultivate both strong ties (trusted collaborators for complex knowledge) and weak ties (fresh perspectives, new opportunities). On LinkedIn, both move the needle.

Read with intent (but don’t rely on it)

Passive reading can build ambient awareness—who knows what, who is working on what—which lowers the friction to ask for help. However, reading alone has small effects. Treat it as reconnaissance that informs outreach and content.

A simple weekly routine

If you want a practical way to implement the findings, try this 60‑minute cadence:

  • 15 minutes: Curate your feed. Follow 5–10 new voices in your specialty (analysts, practitioners, hiring managers). Mute sources that add noise.

  • 20 minutes: Contribute one substantive post. Use a repeatable template: Situation → Approach → Result → Lesson → Question. Aim for clarity and specificity over polish.

  • 15 minutes: Engage in one group thread. Add a concise, evidence‑backed comment; share a resource; ask a focused follow‑up.

  • 10 minutes: Strategic outreach. Send 2–3 personalized connection notes to people aligned with your opportunity lattice. Offer a small value add (e.g. a relevant article or dataset). I use TalentSight to schedule these invites/messages so the habit stays consistent without turning into bulk outreach.

Measuring progress

Track signals that indicate you’re building useful social capital:

  • Content: Saves, shares, thoughtful comments from domain peers; invitations to contribute, speak, or review.

  • Network: Growth in second‑degree connections in target firms or functions; increased responses to your questions or requests.

  • Opportunities: More inbound referrals, informational chats, or interview requests; faster access to domain news.

Common pitfalls (and fixes)

  • Broadcasting updates without substance: Shift to “work narratives” and industry analyses. Tie posts to specific problems and outcomes.

  • Overreliance on strong ties: Expand your weak‑tie surface area in adjacent teams, vendors, clients, and professional communities.

  • Generic connection requests: Personalize with context and value. Brief beats long; relevant beats flattering.

  • Ignoring groups: Pick 2–3 high‑signal groups in your niche and show up weekly.

What about Twitter and Facebook?

Twitter can be excellent for real‑time learning and expert discovery, but tie counts don’t predict benefits there; curation and strategic networking do. Facebook’s social graph skews personal, and its algorithm prioritizes strong ties and entertainment content, which explains the lower professional informational benefits. If you do use Facebook professionally, increase the signal by posting work content and organizing into private groups.

Limitations to keep in mind

The study is cross‑sectional - so while LinkedIn use correlates with higher informational benefits, directionality and causality need longitudinal evidence. Self‑reported activity and rough estimates of tie strength can introduce measurement noise. Still, the consistency of effects across platforms and behaviors is a strong practical guide.

Bottom line

LinkedIn can make you more successful - but only if you actively shape your network and contribute meaningful professional content. Think of your profile and feed as a living portfolio of expertise and relationships. Post with purpose, connect strategically, and engage in the right rooms. Do that, and LinkedIn becomes more than a social site; it becomes your career’s information advantage.